The Creativity Question
I've been reflecting deeply on my strengths and weaknesses lately. Some traits are straightforward to measure—conscientiousness through the Big Five personality test, for instance. Others, like creativity, prove far more elusive. By creativity, I mean the ability to generate original ideas that actually solve problems.
With hundreds of possible traits why does creativity get its own post: Nearly 90% of my impact has come from just a handful of creative insights. The very concept of AIM itself transformed my impact trajectory—enabling us to launch 44 projects in 7 years instead of the mere 3 I might have started as a serial entrepreneur. That's a 15x multiplier on impact.
Yet I constantly hear and do deeply buy that "ideas are cheap, execution is what matters." Of all the creative ideas I've encountered, fewer than 5% created meaningful change. And many highly effective people I admire don't seem to prioritize creativity at all, focusing instead on grit or competence.
What Jobs care about Creativity?
The highest-impact roles that benefit from creativity aren't necessarily the obvious ones. It's not about becoming a famous documentary maker. I see it more about amplifying already high-impact roles and making someone's competitive advocate a good fit for them. Roles like founding or grantmaking. Some roles that seem to benefit less from this trait include management, operations, and even most CEOs. Ones that seem good are listed below.
Grantmaking/Philanthropy: Seeing connections within ecosystems that others miss
Policy Work: Identifying non-obvious leverage points within complex systems
Founding For Profits: Solving problems in ways competitors haven't imagined
Founding NGOs: Solving challenges that others struggle with on limited resources
The Puzzle Piece Method
My most valuable creative approach works like collecting puzzle pieces:
I retain fragments of information that feel potentially valuable
Later, these pieces combine in unexpected ways to form breakthrough ideas
For example:
Puzzle Piece #1: An idea for an "AIM sorting hat" career testing program that didn't quite work
Puzzle Piece #2: The observation that leadership, fundraising, and campaigning are the three critical skill gaps in the animal advocacy movement
Combined Result: A multi-career training program letting people test the five key roles missing in animal advocacy—roles with substantial skill overlap that could be experienced in a compressed timeframe
The trick is developing an instinct for which pieces to keep. Actor names in movies I watch? Delete. A talented project lead seeking their next role? Save. The most valuable puzzle pieces often carry a feeling of both surprise and significance.
The Creativity Formula
I have a sense of how to come up with more ideas in a given day. Three aspects seem pretty key.
Exposure to novel stimuli
Abundant low-stakes social contact
Time to remix and incubate ideas
Novel Stimuli
My creative insights often emerge in unfamiliar environments. A conversation while wandering through a museum led to seeing work challenges through entirely fresh eyes. While major changes like international travel certainly work, I get similar benefits from smaller novelty—taking a different route to work or having a drink in a new bar.
Low-Stakes Social Contact
As an extrovert, I thrive on social interaction—but creativity flourishes with specific conditions:
People I don't regularly talk to (fresh perspectives)
Relationships deep enough to move beyond small talk
Conversations free from professional pressures
The conversations must feel non-transactional. At work conferences, I carefully filter half-formed thoughts. With trusted friends in relaxed settings, creativity flows.
Remix Time
Many of my best ideas emerge during weekends or holidays. While collecting puzzle pieces requires active effort, combining them demands mental space and a playful mindset. This remix phase happens most effectively through:
Relaxed social spaces with trusted confidants
Solo journaling or writing sessions
Regular meditation to create mental spaciousness
The Creative Optimization Challenge
Here's a dilemma: an optimally creative day looks nothing like my productivity-optimized workday.
The Perfect Creative Day:
Biking to a new museum while listening to an audiobook
Exploring exhibits with someone holding different perspectives
Journaling insights at a nearby café
Reading from a physical book on an unrelated topic
Taking a rejuvenating nap
Sharing a meal and conversation with a close friend
My Typical Work Day:
Back-to-back meetings
Email management
Teaching other staff useful knowledge
Highly optimized office environment (multiple screens, shortcut-rich peripherals)
Currently, I have perhaps 3 creativity-optimized days per year versus roughly 300 productivity-optimized days. Should I increase to one creativity day per month?
How much to Focus on Increasing Creativity?
How many days per year should I dedicate to creativity? Assume for sake of the question I found a project as my next job.
P.s. my top book on creativity is a A Whack on the Side of the Head: How You Can Be More Creative (one of my few 5/5 ranked books).
I think there's different types of creativity which need different problems.
I'll call "big picture" creativity, like what you described with a new AIM programme, about strategic direction. I reckon this is best for 2-3 days at a time every quarter or so, with perhaps a larger block once a year. I find holidays good for this, and you can combine it with relaxation and fun too. If you're being corporate, they might be an "away day".
Then there's "details" creativity such as coming up with the next step on an open-ended project (e.g. finding the right lever in a policy job). Here I think it should be as-needed but on a shorter basis. Going for a half hour walk or having a 1-1 meeting with a trusted colleague might be sufficient, and can be worked into a normal working day.
Some of my thoughts:
- Creativity is a lot about being organized, knowledgeable, and implementing it rigorously within your work system.
- The use of creativity methods can help - divisions, analogy, questions, and more (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGFpV7rXww0&t=1759s)
- I use ideation tables to help generate ideas. The table has different multi-select columns which cut different elements into small pieces (this is the division method), and each row is the combination of several pieces into one question. The ideas are the answer to this question. I don't know if this will be clear, but for example if thinking about ideas for a conference, I will choose different elements from the table columns and a specific row it can look like this
Ideation topic: Experience
Beneficiary: Professionals, Newbies
Spaces: Panels
Teasers: Rememberable
❓ What experience of professionals sitting in the audience in panels will be very rememberable?